E Chaves

35 papers receiving 974 citations

Peers

E Chaves
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Physiology 410
  • Biological Psychiatry 35
  • Neurology 95
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 193
  • Cell Biology 169
Replace Annett Häußler with:
Annett Häußler Germany
Yu-ichi Goto Japan
Andrea Bernacchia Italy
Malin Fex Sweden
John Labbadia United Kingdom
Toni Paladino Canada
Mügen Terzioglu Finland
Caterina Cascio Italy
Sandrine Bétuing France
Knut H. Lauritzen Norway
E Chaves relative to Annett Häußler Germany Annett Häußler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Annett Häußler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E Chaves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E Chaves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E Chaves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E Chaves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E Chaves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E Chaves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E Chaves. The network helps show where E Chaves may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E Chaves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E Chaves Line = papers co-authored together E Chaves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009211
2 2008117
3 2007107
4 201078
5 201176
6 199563
7 201040
8 200136
9 201235
10 199532
11 201824
12 197221
13 201120
14 202113
15 199513
16 201213
17 197211
18 201811
19 200810
20
Induction of bladder hyperplasia in rats after a single dose of cyclophosphamide.
19689

About E Chaves

E Chaves is a scholar working on Physiology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 998 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (5 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (4 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (3 papers), Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling (3 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Tumors and Oncological Cases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (410 citations), Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Neurology (95 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (193 citations) and Cell Biology (169 citations). E Chaves has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Brazil and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Simonetta Sipione, Robert B. Campenot, Jean E. Vance, Lucila Saavedra, Christina Christoffersen, Lars B. Nielsen, Vasanthy Narayanaswami, D E Vance, Satyabrata Kar and Dennis E. Vance. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Cancer, The Journal of Cell Biology and Journal of Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact