Douglas Ehring
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 14
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 9
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Co-authors
- John W. Carroll (1 shared paper)Evan Fales (1 shared paper)James Franklin (1 shared paper)Keith Campbell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Analysis (12 papers)Philosophical Studies (7 papers)Synthese (5 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (4 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Douglas Ehring
45 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- History and Philosophy of Science 180
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 237
- Philosophy 184
- Cognitive Neuroscience 63
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Ehring
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Ehring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Ehring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Ehring more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Ehring
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Ehring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Ehring. The network helps show where Douglas Ehring may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Ehring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 67 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 27 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 4 |
About Douglas Ehring
Douglas Ehring is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 48 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (180 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (237 citations), Philosophy (184 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (63 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations). Douglas Ehring has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John W. Carroll, Evan Fales, James Franklin and Keith Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Philosophical Studies, Synthese, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.