Douglas Deur

1.3k citations
37 papers · 585 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Douglas Deur

32 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

Douglas Deur
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Geography, Planning and Development 116
  • Anthropology 102
  • Paleontology 77
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 120
  • Ecology 145
Replace Dan Flores with:
Dan Flores United States
Darren Ranco United States
Monica Minnegal Australia
Andrew Sluyter United States
Thomas E. Sheridan United States
Igor Krupnik United States
Philip A. Clarke Australia
Edvard Hviding Norway
Bruna Franchetto Brazil
Gregory Knapp United States
Douglas Deur relative to Dan Flores United States Dan Flores's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Dan Flores · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Deur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Deur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Deur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Deur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Deur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Deur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Deur. The network helps show where Douglas Deur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Deur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas Deur Line = papers co-authored together Douglas Deur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997213
2 201567
3 199845
4 201344
5 201538
6 201135
7 200228
8 200220
9 200917
10 20229
11
A Most Sacred Place: The Significance of Crater Lake among the Indians of Southern Oregon
20029
12 20139
13 20157
14 20007
15 20206
16 19974
17 20164
18 19963
19
An Ethnohistorical Overview of Groups with Ties to Fort Vancouver National Historic Site
20123
20 20202

About Douglas Deur

Douglas Deur is a scholar working on Anthropology, General Health Professions, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Geography, Planning and Development and Health, having authored 37 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Studies and Ecology (9 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (8 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (7 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (5 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (4 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (4 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (4 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (116 citations), Anthropology (102 citations), Paleontology (77 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (120 citations) and Ecology (145 citations). Douglas Deur has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard White, Nancy J. Turner, Thomas F. Thornton, Dana Lepofsky, Edward C. Wolf, Peter Schoonmaker, Kate A. Berry, Robert A. Rundstrom, Virginia L. Butler and Michael E. Harkin. Their work appears in journals such as Human Ecology, Oregon Historical Quarterly, Journal of Ethnobiology, Geographical Review and The Professional Geographer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact