Peter Schoonmaker

973 citations
13 papers · 772 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Schoonmaker

10 papers receiving 644 citations

Peers

Peter Schoonmaker
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 530
  • Global and Planetary Change 318
  • Ecology 367
  • Insect Science 152
  • Environmental Chemistry 92
Replace M.A. Baars with:
M.A. Baars Netherlands
Morgan D. Hocking Canada
Jerzy Kolasa United States
Susan W. Vince United States
Irene Zweimüller Austria
Sanjay Pyare United States
Lusha M. Tronstad United States
Marco Mina Russia
E. S. G. Schreiber Australia
Motomi Genkai‐Kato Japan
Peter Schoonmaker relative to M.A. Baars Netherlands M.A. Baars's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
M.A. Baars · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schoonmaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schoonmaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schoonmaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schoonmaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schoonmaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schoonmaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schoonmaker. The network helps show where Peter Schoonmaker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schoonmaker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schoonmaker Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schoonmaker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2000274
2 1988156
3 1992117
4
Species composition and diversity during secondary succession of coniferous forest in the western Cascade mountains of Oregon
198865
5 199153
6 199845
7 201627
8 201716
9 20189
10 19845
11
Habitat monitoring : an approach for reporting status and trends for state comprehensive wildlife conservation strategies
20053
12 19852
13
Restoring the Willamette basin: issues and challenges
19990

About Peter Schoonmaker

Peter Schoonmaker is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 772 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (2 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2 papers) and Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (530 citations), Global and Planetary Change (318 citations), Ecology (367 citations), Insect Science (152 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (92 citations). Peter Schoonmaker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jim Lichatowich, Arthur McKee, David R. Foster, Ann L. Lezberg, Tad M. Zebryk, Douglas Deur, Edward C. Wolf, Audrey Barker Plotkin, Anthony W. D’Amato and David A. Orwig. Their work appears in journals such as Ornithological Applications, Ecology, Forest Ecology and Management, Forest Science and Journal of Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact