Douglas Cane

1.3k citations
18 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Douglas Cane

17 papers receiving 990 citations

Peers

Douglas Cane
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 580
  • Clinical Psychology 503
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 267
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 210
  • Applied Psychology 63
Replace Serena Bezdjian with:
Serena Bezdjian United States
Angela Ritenour United States
Lizabeth A. Goldstein United States
Nancy Just United States
Patrick A. Vogel Norway
Elizabeth Bartmess United States
Holly J. Ramsawh United States
Ciarán O’Driscoll United Kingdom
Rachel H. Wasserman United States
Mike Acree United States
Douglas Cane relative to Serena Bezdjian United States Serena Bezdjian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Serena Bezdjian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Cane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Cane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Cane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Cane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Cane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Cane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Cane. The network helps show where Douglas Cane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Cane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas Cane Line = papers co-authored together Douglas Cane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1986210
2
Self-report assessment of depression and anxiety.
1989210
3 1987193
4 1987169
5 201273
6 198545
7 202031
8 201628
9 201819
10 201817
11 201917
12 201817
13 198515
14 201712
15 20205
16 20251
17 20241
18 20260

About Douglas Cane

Douglas Cane is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Rehabilitation, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (10 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (580 citations), Clinical Psychology (503 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (267 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (210 citations) and Applied Psychology (63 citations). Douglas Cane has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ian H. Gotlib, L. Joan Olinger, Nicholas A. Kuiper, Dwight Mazmanian, Mary McCarthy, Warren R. Nielson, Mark P. Jensen, Jordi Miró, Elena Castarlenas and Ester Solé. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Journal of Pain, Pain, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Pain Practice and Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact