Douglas Cane

1.3k citations
18 papers · 1.1k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Douglas Cane

17 papers receiving 998 citations

Peers

Douglas Cane
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 537
  • Clinical Psychology 460
  • Applied Psychology 60
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 155
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 215
Replace Richard J. Macatee with:
Richard J. Macatee United States
Linda L. Street United States
Ari Solomon United States
Amy L. Fasiczka United States
Laura Dreessen Netherlands
Paul D. Rokke United States
Halina J. Dour United States
Leanne Quigley Canada
Murray Stein United States
Nancy Just United States
Douglas Cane relative to Richard J. Macatee United States Richard J. Macatee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Richard J. Macatee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Cane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Cane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Cane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Cane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Cane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Cane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Cane. The network helps show where Douglas Cane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Cane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas Cane Line = papers co-authored together Douglas Cane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1986210
2
Self-report assessment of depression and anxiety.
1989210
3 1987192
4 1987168
5 201273
6 198545
7 202033
8 201628
9 201820
10 201918
11 201817
12 201817
13 198515
14 201714
15 20205
16 20253
17 20241
18 20260

About Douglas Cane

Douglas Cane is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (537 citations), Clinical Psychology (460 citations), Applied Psychology (60 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (155 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (215 citations). Douglas Cane has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ian H. Gotlib, L. Joan Olinger, Nicholas A. Kuiper, Dwight Mazmanian, Mary McCarthy, Warren R. Nielson, Jordi Miró, Mark P. Jensen, Mélanie Racine and Ester Solé. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Journal of Pain, Pain, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Pain Practice and Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact