Douglas A. Wait

710 citations
12 papers · 597 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Douglas A. Wait

12 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Douglas A. Wait
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Water Science and Technology 370
  • Infectious Diseases 119
  • Hepatology 33
  • Endocrinology 10
  • Biotechnology 15
Replace Daniel R. Dahling with:
Daniel R. Dahling United States
Peter Wyn-Jones United Kingdom
Rosanna Gabrieli Italy
Elmer W. Akin United States
James M. Vaughn United States
Eliyahu Katzenelson Israel
B. Mignotte France
William Doré Ireland
Jennifer Gentry-Shields United States
Karim Helmi France
Douglas A. Wait relative to Daniel R. Dahling United States Daniel R. Dahling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Daniel R. Dahling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas A. Wait

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas A. Wait's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas A. Wait with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas A. Wait more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas A. Wait

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas A. Wait. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas A. Wait. The network helps show where Douglas A. Wait may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Douglas A. Wait, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas A. Wait Line = papers co-authored together Douglas A. Wait links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1995111
2 200398
3 200390
4 200178
5 198345
6 198340
7 198537
8 200433
9 202131
10 198520
11 199311
12 20073

About Douglas A. Wait

Douglas A. Wait is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Infectious Diseases, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Food Science and General Health Professions, having authored 12 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fecal contamination and water quality (9 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (1 paper), Infection Control in Healthcare (1 paper), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (1 paper), Water Treatment and Disinfection (1 paper), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (370 citations), Infectious Diseases (119 citations), Hepatology (33 citations), Endocrinology (10 citations) and Biotechnology (15 citations). Douglas A. Wait has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark D. Sobsey, Greg L. Lovelace, Joan B. Rose, Jennifer Jarrell Wetz, Jerzy O. Lukasik, Rachel T. Noble, Troy M. Scott, Jill R. Stewart, A. Denene Blackwood and Dale Warren Griffin. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Water and Health, Water Science & Technology, Journal of AOAC International and Marine Pollution Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact