Developing World Bioethics

512 papers and 5.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 512 papers published in Developing World Bioethics in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Developing World Bioethics usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (265 papers), General Health Professions (212 papers) and Physiology (95 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in Clinical Research (164 papers), Ethics in medical practice (154 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Developing World Bioethics are David B. Resnik, Florencia Luna, Donna Dickenson, Ross Upshur, Andrew D. Pinto, Thaddeus Metz, Robert Klitzman, Paul Farmer, Adnan A. Hyder and Casey Jo Humbyrd.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Developing World Bioethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Developing World Bioethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Developing World Bioethics.

Countries where authors publish in Developing World Bioethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Developing World Bioethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Developing World Bioethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Developing World Bioethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025