Don A. Smith
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Migration, Health and Trauma
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 2
- Child Abuse and Trauma 2
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 2
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 2
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 2
- Co-authors
- Peter Ellis (4 shared papers)Kate M. Scott (2 shared papers)Katie A. McLaughlin (1 shared paper)Ersin Göğüş (1 shared paper)C. Kouveliotou (1 shared paper)Mark H. Finger (1 shared paper)K. Hurley (1 shared paper)Peter Woods (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychosomatic Medicine (1 paper)The Astrophysical Journal (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Australasian Psychiatry (1 paper)BJPsych Bulletin (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Don A. Smith
9 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Clinical Psychology 233
- Behavioral Neuroscience 36
- Biological Psychiatry 15
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 75
- Health 33
Countries citing papers authored by Don A. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Don A. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don A. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don A. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Don A. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don A. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don A. Smith. The network helps show where Don A. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Don A. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 244 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 5 | 1974 | 6 | |
| 6 | Specific Predictors of Learning Disabilities. | 1977 | 2 |
| 7 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 8 | XTE J1901+014: a new, fast X-ray transient | 2002 | 1 |
| 9 | 2015 | 1 |
About Don A. Smith
Don A. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pharmacology, General Health Professions and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (2 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (233 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (36 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (75 citations) and Health (33 citations). Don A. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Ellis, Kate M. Scott, Katie A. McLaughlin, Ersin Göğüş, C. Kouveliotou, Mark H. Finger, K. Hurley, Peter Woods, J. H. Swank and Ian B. Hickie. Their work appears in journals such as Psychosomatic Medicine, The Astrophysical Journal, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Australasian Psychiatry and BJPsych Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.