Diane E. Hoffmann

66 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Diane E. Hoffmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Pharmacy 100
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 96
  • Health Informatics 21
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 364
  • General Health Professions 288
Replace Paul Clarke with:
Paul Clarke United Kingdom
Brooke Hoots United States
Matthew Greenhawt United States
Carol Bova United States
S Krugman United States
Charles Marwick United States
Anderson Spickard United States
Gwen Wyatt United States
Sıddıka Songül Yalçın Türkiye
Charles E. Gessert United States
Diane E. Hoffmann relative to Paul Clarke United Kingdom Paul Clarke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Paul Clarke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane E. Hoffmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane E. Hoffmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane E. Hoffmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane E. Hoffmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane E. Hoffmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane E. Hoffmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane E. Hoffmann. The network helps show where Diane E. Hoffmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane E. Hoffmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane E. Hoffmann Line = papers co-authored together Diane E. Hoffmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001382
2 201092
3 199366
4 199262
5 200446
6 199545
7 201743
8 201342
9 201741
10 200339
11
Probiotics: achieving a better regulatory fit.
201439
12 200036
13 201935
14 201535
15 199334
16 202331
17 202031
18 200527
19 199123
20 201922

About Diane E. Hoffmann

Diane E. Hoffmann is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy, Infectious Diseases and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (14 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (13 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (9 papers), Gut microbiota and health (8 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (6 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (100 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (96 citations), Health Informatics (21 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (364 citations) and General Health Professions (288 citations). Diane E. Hoffmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Anita J. Tarzian, Virginia Rowthorn, Ellen Weber, Jacques Ravel, Gerhard H. Reubel, Francis B. Palumbo, Alexander Khoruts, Eric A. Wulfsberg, Niels C. Pedersen and Jack Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, Science, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Gut Microbes and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact