The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics

2.3k papers and 27.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 27.5k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (896 papers), General Health Professions (839 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (471 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in Clinical Research (417 papers), Ethics in medical practice (293 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (233 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics are Mark A. Rothstein, Lawrence O. Gostin, Leann L. Birch, Jennifer O. Fisher, Jennifer S. Savage, Diane E. Hoffmann, Susan M. Wolf, Charles Weijer, Anita J. Tarzian and Rebecca Dresser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025