Chemical Research in Toxicology

6.8k papers and 259.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.8k papers published in Chemical Research in Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 259.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Chemical Research in Toxicology usually cover Molecular Biology (3.0k papers), Organic Chemistry (1.2k papers) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (915 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (728 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (669 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chemical Research in Toxicology are F. Peter Guengerich, Stephen S. Hecht, Anatoly Zhitkovich, John E. Casida, Richard N. Armstrong, Jack Uetrecht, Joseph S. Beckman, Harry Ischiropoulos, D.C. Liebler and Judy L. Bolton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chemical Research in Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chemical Research in Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chemical Research in Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Chemical Research in Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chemical Research in Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chemical Research in Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemical Research in Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025