Diana Wolf
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Microbiology top 10%
- Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Papers in
-
- Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing 6
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 3
- Genetics 9
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 9
- Co-authors
- Herwig O. Gutzeit (1 shared paper)Ariane Müller (1 shared paper)Thorsten Mascher (10 shared papers)Richard A. Daniel (1 shared paper)Patricia Domínguez‐Cuevas (1 shared paper)Falk Kalamorz (1 shared paper)Michael Hoppert (1 shared paper)Michael Hecker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Microbiology (2 papers)Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Journal of Bacteriology (1 paper)Molecular Microbiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Diana Wolf
18 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Insect Science 178
- Microbiology 53
- Molecular Medicine 34
- Genetics 178
- Social Psychology 112
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Wolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Wolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Wolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Wolf. The network helps show where Diana Wolf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 172 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 96 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1975 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1 |
About Diana Wolf
Diana Wolf is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Food Science and Pharmacology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (9 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (6 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (6 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (2 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (178 citations), Microbiology (53 citations), Molecular Medicine (34 citations), Genetics (178 citations) and Social Psychology (112 citations). Diana Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Herwig O. Gutzeit, Ariane Müller, Thorsten Mascher, Richard A. Daniel, Patricia Domínguez‐Cuevas, Falk Kalamorz, Michael Hoppert, Michael Hecker, Birgit Voigt and Sina Jordan. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Scientific Reports, Journal of Bacteriology and Molecular Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.