Dennis John

16 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Dennis John
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 56
  • Applied Psychology 70
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 148
  • Social Psychology 178
  • General Decision Sciences 12
Replace Emily Chan with:
Emily Chan United States
Kaori Karasawa Japan
Anthony D. Hermann United States
Jessica Heppen United States
Christopher S. Nave United States
Alan C. Mikkelson United States
Ashley Bell Jones United States
Kai T. Horstmann Germany
Malte Schott Germany
Courtney Heldreth United States
Dennis John relative to Emily Chan United States Emily Chan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Emily Chan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis John

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis John more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis John

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis John. The network helps show where Dennis John may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Dennis John, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dennis John Line = papers co-authored together Dennis John links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2011348
2 201754
3 201525
4 201916
5 202215
6 20198
7 20127
8
Short Assessment of the Big Five: Robust Across Survey Methods Except Telephone Interviewing
20116
9 20186
10 20234
11 20184
12 20243
13 20213
14 20211
15 20221
16 20241
17 20250
18 20250

About Dennis John

Dennis John is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Health and Medical Studies (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (2 papers) and Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (56 citations), Applied Psychology (70 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (148 citations), Social Psychology (178 citations) and General Decision Sciences (12 citations). Dennis John has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and India. Frequent co-authors include Frieder R. Lang, Jürgen Schupp, Oliver Lüdtke, Gert G. Wagner, Helene H. Fung, Rüdiger Pryss, Thomas Probst, Manfred Reichert, Johannes Schobel and Niko Kohls. Their work appears in journals such as JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Data in Brief, Frontiers in Psychology, Developmental Psychology and Behavior Research Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact