Malte Schott
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
Papers in
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 3
-
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 2
- Co-authors
- Klaus Fiedler (4 shared papers)Thorsten Meiser (1 shared paper)Chris Harris (1 shared paper)Mandy Hütter (1 shared paper)Florian Kutzner (1 shared paper)Markolf H. Niemz (1 shared paper)Yaakov Kareev (1 shared paper)Morris Goldsmith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2 papers)Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (1 paper)Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (1 paper)Social Psychology (1 paper)Applied Optics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Malte Schott
7 papers receiving 747 citations
Malte Schott's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Applied Psychology 105
- General Decision Sciences 31
- Social Psychology 336
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
- Sociology and Political Science 371
Countries citing papers authored by Malte Schott
This map shows the geographic impact of Malte Schott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malte Schott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malte Schott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malte Schott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malte Schott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malte Schott. The network helps show where Malte Schott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Malte Schott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What mediation analysis can (not) do Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 450 |
| 2 | Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests – An analysis of articles published in 2015 Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 284 |
| 3 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 3 |
About Malte Schott
Malte Schott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Decision Sciences, Communication, Computer Networks and Communications and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 7 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper) and Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (105 citations), General Decision Sciences (31 citations), Social Psychology (336 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (131 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (371 citations). Malte Schott has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Fiedler, Thorsten Meiser, Chris Harris, Mandy Hütter, Florian Kutzner, Markolf H. Niemz, Yaakov Kareev, Morris Goldsmith, André Mata and Mário B. Ferreira. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Social Psychology and Applied Optics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.