Denise Button

903 citations
11 papers · 654 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Neurology top 5%
    • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
    • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
    • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Papers in

Denise Button

10 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers

Denise Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Neurology 312
  • Internal Medicine 51
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 191
  • Epidemiology 276
  • Research and Theory 3
Replace Senthil K Raghunathan with:
Senthil K Raghunathan United Kingdom
Kyohei Fujita Japan
Matthieu Pierre Rutgers Belgium
Ed Gamble United Kingdom
Thant Hlaing United Kingdom
Peter Owusu‐Agyei United Kingdom
Junpei Koge Japan
Christian Ovesen Denmark
Silvia Cenciarelli Italy
Tolga Daniel Dittrich Switzerland
Denise Button relative to Senthil K Raghunathan United Kingdom Senthil K Raghunathan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Senthil K Raghunathan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Button. The network helps show where Denise Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Denise Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise Button Line = papers co-authored together Denise Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2018189
2 2019145
3 2017129
4 201971
5 201533
6 202132
7 199829
8
Continence - Promotion and Management by the Primary Health Care Team: Consensus Guidelines
199814
9 19947
10 19965
11 19910

About Denise Button

Denise Button is a scholar working on Neurology, Health Information Management, General Health Professions, Philosophy and Rheumatology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 654 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (4 papers), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (1 paper), Social and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper), Higher Education Learning Practices (1 paper), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Trade Secret Protection Methods (1 paper) and Reflective Practices in Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (312 citations), Internal Medicine (51 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (191 citations), Epidemiology (276 citations) and Research and Theory (3 citations). Denise Button has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Brenda H Roe, Christine Webb, Sue Davies, Hannah Cooke, Laurence B. Gardner, Moira J. Attree, Judith Morris and Martin Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Neurology, Nurse Education Today, The Lancet, JAMA Neurology and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact