Dee Williams

754 citations
16 papers · 520 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Dee Williams

13 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

Dee Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 188
  • Geography, Planning and Development 66
  • Archeology 8
  • Anthropology 70
  • Sociology and Political Science 196
Replace Dan Flores with:
Dan Flores United States
Thomas E. Sheridan United States
Andrew Sluyter United States
Douglas Deur United States
Monica Minnegal Australia
Gregory Knapp United States
Hermann Kreutzmann Germany
L. J. Gorenflo United States
John Wagner Canada
Edvard Hviding Norway
Dee Williams relative to Dan Flores United States Dan Flores's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Dan Flores · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dee Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dee Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dee Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dee Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dee Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dee Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dee Williams. The network helps show where Dee Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dee Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dee Williams Line = papers co-authored together Dee Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1998238
2 199682
3 199663
4 201941
5 200030
6 199721
7 199711
8 202010
9 19978
10 20217
11
Subjective landscapes and resource management on the Chinese grasslands of Inner Mongolia
19963
12 19982
13 20162
14 20221
15
Representations of Nature on the Mongolian Steppe: An Investigation of Scientific Knowledge...
20001
16 20210

About Dee Williams

Dee Williams is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Atmospheric Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 16 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (8 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (2 papers), Transboundary Water Resource Management (2 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (2 papers), Seismology and Earthquake Studies (2 papers) and Cryospheric studies and observations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (188 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (66 citations), Archeology (8 citations), Anthropology (70 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (196 citations). Dee Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gı́sli Pálsson, Philippe Descola, Li Erikson, Amy Lauren Lovecraft, T. A. Scambos, Twila Moon, Henry P. Huntington, Marika M. Holland, Irina Overeem and Edward A. G. Schuur. Their work appears in journals such as Earth s Future, Post-Medieval Archaeology, American Anthropologist, Modern China and American Ethnologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact