Post-Medieval Archaeology

600 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 600 papers published in Post-Medieval Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Post-Medieval Archaeology usually cover Anthropology (279 papers), Archeology (269 papers) and Paleontology (190 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (254 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (190 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (119 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Post-Medieval Archaeology are Harold Mytum, Lorna Weatherill, Charles E. Orser, Peter Davies, James R. Dixon, David Gaimster, Christopher M. Welch, Hugh Willmott, Torben Bjarke Ballin and John Schofield.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Post-Medieval Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Post-Medieval Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Post-Medieval Archaeology.

Countries where authors publish in Post-Medieval Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Post-Medieval Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Post-Medieval Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Post-Medieval Archaeology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025