Deborah McCormick

408 citations
10 papers · 296 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah McCormick

10 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Deborah McCormick
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Gender Studies 188
  • Clinical Psychology 189
  • Sociology and Political Science 161
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 36
  • Communication 16
Replace Daniel Klassen with:
Daniel Klassen United States
Ahmet Sami Konca Türkiye
Katherine K. Rose United States
Verena Letzel Germany
Merle Taimalu Estonia
Lavinia McLean United Kingdom
Whitney Alicia Zimmerman United States
Hannah Lena Merdian United Kingdom
Jill Walston United States
Burak Aydın Türkiye
Deborah McCormick relative to Daniel Klassen United States Daniel Klassen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Daniel Klassen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah McCormick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah McCormick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah McCormick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah McCormick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah McCormick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah McCormick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah McCormick. The network helps show where Deborah McCormick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Deborah McCormick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah McCormick Line = papers co-authored together Deborah McCormick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2001138
2 200048
3 200038
4 198638
5 198513
6 19909
7
Essentials of Health and Wellness
20049
8
Faculty Development for ACTIVE Learning
20011
9
Computer Access and Flowcharting as Variables in Learning Computer Programming.
19891
10
If I Am an Artist, What's Wrong with My Picture? Rediscovering Your Creativity in a Grown-up World.
19971

About Deborah McCormick

Deborah McCormick is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Education, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science Applications, having authored 10 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper), Innovative Teaching Methods (1 paper), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (1 paper) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (188 citations), Clinical Psychology (189 citations), Sociology and Political Science (161 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (36 citations) and Communication (16 citations). Deborah McCormick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra Evans, Patricia Goodson, Steven M. Ross and James B. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Educational Research, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Journal of Sex Education and Therapy and CyberPsychology & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact