Deborah E. Harkness

429 citations
10 papers · 93 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • History of Science and Natural History
    • Historical Philosophy and Science
    • History of Science and Medicine
  • History top 5%
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Papers in

Deborah E. Harkness

9 papers receiving 57 citations

Peers

Deborah E. Harkness
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • History and Philosophy of Science 29
  • History 40
  • Museology 7
  • Anthropology 19
  • Theoretical Computer Science 2
Replace Letizia Panizza with:
Letizia Panizza United Kingdom
Liba Taub United Kingdom
Marisa Linton United Kingdom
Ben Lowe United States
Wilhelm Schmidt‐Biggemann Germany
Gianni Paganini Italy
Philip Connell
Karlheinz Stierle France
Erica Harth United States
Robert Descimon France
Deborah E. Harkness relative to Letizia Panizza United Kingdom Letizia Panizza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Letizia Panizza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah E. Harkness

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah E. Harkness's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah E. Harkness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah E. Harkness more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah E. Harkness

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah E. Harkness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah E. Harkness. The network helps show where Deborah E. Harkness may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Deborah E. Harkness, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah E. Harkness Line = papers co-authored together Deborah E. Harkness links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Deborah E. Harkness

Deborah E. Harkness is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Economics and Econometrics, History, Philosophy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 93 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Australian Indigenous Culture and History (1 paper) and Science and Climate Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (29 citations), History (40 citations), Museology (7 citations), Anthropology (19 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations). Deborah E. Harkness has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean E. Howard. Their work appears in journals such as Renaissance Quarterly, Isis, Huntington Library Quarterly, Bulletin of the history of medicine and Sixteenth Century Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact