Liba Taub
Impact in
-
- History of Science and Natural History
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- History of Science and Medicine
- Anthropology top 10%
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Classical Antiquity Studies
Papers in
-
- Historical and Literary Studies 5
-
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 6
- Historical and Architectural Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Paul Τ. Keyser (1 shared paper)Alexander Jones (1 shared paper)Mary Jo Nye (1 shared paper)Paul Lawrence Färber (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of Science (2 papers)Isis (2 papers)Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2 papers)Early Science and Medicine (1 paper)The British Journal for the History of Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Liba Taub
22 papers receiving 111 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- History and Philosophy of Science 45
- Anthropology 59
- Philosophy 57
- Archeology 43
- Conservation 10
Countries citing papers authored by Liba Taub
This map shows the geographic impact of Liba Taub's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liba Taub with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liba Taub more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liba Taub
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liba Taub. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liba Taub. The network helps show where Liba Taub may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Liba Taub, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 8 | The Whipple Museum of the History of Science: Instruments and Interpretations, to Celebrate the 60th Anniversary of R. S. Whipple's Gift to the University of Cambridge | 2006 | 6 |
| 9 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 2 |
About Liba Taub
Liba Taub is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 31 papers that have together received 152 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (5 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), History of Science and Natural History (3 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (2 papers) and History and Developments in Astronomy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations), Anthropology (59 citations), Philosophy (57 citations), Archeology (43 citations) and Conservation (10 citations). Liba Taub has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul Τ. Keyser, Alexander Jones, Mary Jo Nye and Paul Lawrence Färber. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Science, Isis, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Early Science and Medicine and The British Journal for the History of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.