Bulletin of the history of medicine

1.1k papers and 6.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Bulletin of the history of medicine in the last decades have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Bulletin of the history of medicine usually cover History (523 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (333 papers) and Clinical Psychology (238 papers) specifically the topics of History of Science and Medicine (260 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (220 papers) and Medical History and Innovations (197 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bulletin of the history of medicine are Niall Johnson, Juergen Mueller, Ted J. Kaptchuk, Charles E. Rosenberg, Warwick Anderson, George Weisz, Margaret Humphreys, Nick Hopwood, Paul Weindling and Mark Harrison.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Bulletin of the history of medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bulletin of the history of medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bulletin of the history of medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Bulletin of the history of medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bulletin of the history of medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bulletin of the history of medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bulletin of the history of medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025