Deborah Downs

1.1k citations
23 papers · 859 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Downs

23 papers receiving 828 citations

Peers

Deborah Downs
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Applied Psychology 47
  • Pharmacology 136
  • Physiology 196
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 117
  • Social Psychology 110
Replace Alice M. Young with:
Alice M. Young United States
John A. Bachman United States
David Singer United States
Anna Cheung Hong Kong
Claes Andersson Sweden
Monika Schmidt Czechia
Ranjana Mitra United States
David M. Ball United Kingdom
Junli Wang China
Marc Ouellet Canada
Deborah Downs relative to Alice M. Young United States Alice M. Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Alice M. Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Downs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Downs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Downs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Downs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Downs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Downs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Downs. The network helps show where Deborah Downs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Downs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Downs Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Downs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994132
2 1994122
3 201092
4 199186
5 200474
6 201357
7 200053
8 198835
9 200734
10 199427
11 198627
12 199619
13 201917
14 200315
15 201614
16
A Kernel design for a secure data base management system
197713
17 200212
18
Hyperlipidemia in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
19849
19 20197
20 19795

About Deborah Downs

Deborah Downs is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Physiology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 23 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (7 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (5 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (3 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (3 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (2 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (47 citations), Pharmacology (136 citations), Physiology (196 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (117 citations) and Social Psychology (110 citations). Deborah Downs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jordan Tang, John B. Nezlek, Mark R. Leary, Arun K. Ghosh, Chi‐Sun Wang, Wan‐Pin Chang, et al, Anne K. McMullen, Kenneth W. Jackson and Jeffrey Martin. Their work appears in journals such as The FASEB Journal, Biochemistry, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ChemMedChem and Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact