David Trend

526 citations
24 papers · 275 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

David Trend

18 papers receiving 195 citations

Peers

David Trend
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 36
  • Communication 31
  • Literature and Literary Theory 37
  • Gender Studies 32
  • Music 10
Replace Lynn Worsham with:
Lynn Worsham United States
Charles J. Stivale United States
Richard Appignanesi United Kingdom
J Benedict India
Black Hawk Hancock United States
Jeffrey T. Nealon United States
Sue Thornham United Kingdom
Edith Kurzweil United States
Sharon Lockyer United Kingdom
Celine-Marie Pascale United States
David Trend relative to Lynn Worsham United States Lynn Worsham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Lynn Worsham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Trend

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Trend's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Trend with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Trend more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Trend

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Trend. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Trend. The network helps show where David Trend may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside David Trend, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Trend Line = papers co-authored together David Trend links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Radical democracy : identity, citizenship, and the state
199486
2
Cultural Pedagogy: Art/Education/Politics
199249
3 200347
4
The Myth of Media Violence: A Critical Introduction
200729
5 199215
6 199310
7
The crisis of meaning in culture and education
19958
8
Welcome to cyberschool
20015
9
Everyday Culture: Finding and Making Meaning in a Changing World
20074
10 20104
11 19884
12 20033
13 19943
14 20122
15 19902
16 19871
17 20191
18 19931
19 19871
20 19870

About David Trend

David Trend is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education and Urban Studies, having authored 24 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper), Critical Theory and Political Philosophy (1 paper) and Global Education and Multiculturalism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (36 citations), Communication (31 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (37 citations), Gender Studies (32 citations) and Music (10 citations). David Trend has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Tambling and Henry A. Giroux. Their work appears in journals such as Cultural Studies, The Modern Language Review, Harvard Educational Review, The Review of Education Pedagogy & Cultural Studies and Policy Futures in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact