David Trend

526 citations
28 papers · 330 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

David Trend

19 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers

David Trend
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 38
  • Communication 35
  • Gender Studies 32
  • Literature and Literary Theory 39
  • Sociology and Political Science 148
Replace J Benedict with:
J Benedict India
Leo Löwenthal Switzerland
Wlad Godzich United States
Black Hawk Hancock United States
Christoph Wulf Germany
Hans Bertens Netherlands
Richard Appignanesi United Kingdom
Mikhail Epstein United States
Ruth Ayaß Germany
Ronald D. Cohen United States
David Trend relative to J Benedict India J Benedict's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J Benedict · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Trend

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Trend's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Trend with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Trend more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Trend

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Trend. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Trend. The network helps show where David Trend may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside David Trend, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Trend Line = papers co-authored together David Trend links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Radical democracy : identity, citizenship, and the state
1994118
2
Cultural Pedagogy: Art/Education/Politics
199253
3 200351
4
The Myth of Media Violence: A Critical Introduction
200733
5 199215
6 199311
7
The crisis of meaning in culture and education
19958
8 19887
9
Welcome to cyberschool
20015
10
Everyday Culture: Finding and Making Meaning in a Changing World
20075
11 20105
12 20034
13 19943
14 20122
15 19902
16 19872
17 20222
18 20192
19 19871
20 19931

About David Trend

David Trend is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Urban Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education, having authored 28 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art, Politics, and Modernism (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (2 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (2 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper) and Critical Theory and Political Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (38 citations), Communication (35 citations), Gender Studies (32 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (39 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (148 citations). David Trend has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Tambling and Henry A. Giroux. Their work appears in journals such as Cultural Studies, The Review of Education Pedagogy & Cultural Studies, Harvard Educational Review, The Modern Language Review and Policy Futures in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact