David Ring

48 papers receiving 581 citations

Peers

David Ring
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Family Practice 26
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 83
  • Surgery 358
  • Rehabilitation 49
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 86
Replace Tom J. Crijns with:
Tom J. Crijns United States
Joost T.P. Kortlever United States
Michiel G.J.S. Hageman United States
John Kadzielski United States
Amirreza Fatehi United States
Jianyu Lai United States
Jason Guattery United States
Daniel Saddawi‐Konefka United States
Catherine Young United States
Jos J. Mellema United States
David Ring relative to Tom J. Crijns United States Tom J. Crijns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.5×
Tom J. Crijns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ring. The network helps show where David Ring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ring Line = papers co-authored together David Ring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016109
2 199540
3 201738
4 202137
5 201434
6 201530
7 202228
8 201324
9 202021
10 201919
11 201918
12 202115
13
Diagnosis and treatment of less common compartment syndromes of the upper and lower extremities: current evidence and best practices.
201115
14 202014
15 202113
16 201611
17 202011
18 202010
19
Pyogenic infectious spondylitis in children. The evolution to current thought.
199610
20 20159

About David Ring

David Ring is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and Epidemiology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (16 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (12 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (5 papers) and Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (26 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (83 citations), Surgery (358 citations), Rehabilitation (49 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (86 citations). David Ring has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Mariano E. Menendez, Neal C. Chen, Femke M. A. P. Claessen, Amin Mohamadi, Jimmy J. Chan, Joost T.P. Kortlever, Tom J. Crijns, Howard Rosen, Jesse B. Jupiter and Karl Koenig. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Quality Management in Health Care, Hand and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact