Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

6.0k papers and 171.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.0k papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma in the last decades have received a total of 171.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma usually cover Surgery (5.2k papers), Epidemiology (3.0k papers) and Rehabilitation (778 papers) specifically the topics of Bone fractures and treatments (2.5k papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (1.8k papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma are Kenneth J. Koval, Roy Sanders, Emil H. Schemitsch, Paul Tornetta, Kenneth A. Egol, Mohit Bhandari, Milton L. Chip Routt, William M. Ricci, Thomas DiPasquale and Michael W. Chapman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025