Countries where authors publish in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.
About Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
The 6.0k papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma in the last decades have received a total of 184.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma usually cover Rehabilitation (596 papers), Surgery (3.4k papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (557 papers), Epidemiology (2.2k papers) and Emergency Medicine (197 papers) specifically the topics of Bone fractures and treatments (1.8k papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (1.0k papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (832 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (762 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (454 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (419 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (380 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (350 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma are Kenneth J. Koval, Roy Sanders, Emil H. Schemitsch, Paul Tornetta, Kenneth A. Egol, Mohit Bhandari, Milton L. Chip Routt, William M. Ricci, Michael W. Chapman and David L. Helfet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.