David Rea

492 citations
26 papers · 332 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Mental Health and Patient Involvement 5
    • Primary Care and Health Outcomes 4
    • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 2
    • Healthcare innovation and challenges 5

David Rea

26 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

David Rea
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Neurology 60
  • Emergency Medical Services 25
  • General Health Professions 70
  • Rheumatology 37
  • Gender Studies 22
Replace Timothy A. Johnston with:
Timothy A. Johnston Australia
Martin Groß Germany
Christo Albor United Kingdom
Warren H. Pearse United States
Angelita Martini Australia
Sangeeta Dhami United Kingdom
Adriana Reyes United States
Andrew Webster United Kingdom
Meredith Wallace Kazer United States
Hong Qiao China
David Rea relative to Timothy A. Johnston Australia Timothy A. Johnston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Timothy A. Johnston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Rea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Rea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Rea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Rea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Rea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Rea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Rea. The network helps show where David Rea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Rea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Rea Line = papers co-authored together David Rea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200992
2 200450
3 201343
4 201529
5 201722
6 199810
7 199910
8 20029
9 20188
10 20116
11 20206
12 20046
13 20006
14 20176
15 20185
16 20005
17 20214
18 20244
19 20002
20
How nurses perceive mandatory continuing education.
19772

About David Rea

David Rea is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education, Economics and Econometrics, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers), Quality and Supply Management (2 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (2 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (60 citations), Emergency Medical Services (25 citations), General Health Professions (70 citations), Rheumatology (37 citations) and Gender Studies (22 citations). David Rea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Griffiths, Patricia C. Parkin, Daune MacGregor, John F. Brandsema, Derek Armstrong, Gabrielle deVeber, William J. Logan, Rand Askalan, Simon Chapple and Stefan Siebert. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, Journal of Mental Health, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Policy & Politics and Social Work in Health Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact