David R. Como

521 citations
16 papers · 179 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • History top 2%
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
    • Scottish History and National Identity
    • Historical Studies of British Isles
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Papers in

David R. Como

13 papers receiving 111 citations

Peers

David R. Como
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • History 139
  • Religious studies 20
  • Political Science and International Relations 78
  • Classics 11
  • History and Philosophy of Science 8
Replace W. B. Patterson with:
W. B. Patterson United States
Ethan H. Shagan United States
William Lamont United Kingdom
Anthony Milton United Kingdom
Tom Webster United Kingdom
Susan Wabuda United States
Roger Lejosne United States
Giorgio Inglese
Judith Maltby United States
Alastair Duke United Kingdom
David R. Como relative to W. B. Patterson United States W. B. Patterson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
W. B. Patterson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David R. Como

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Como's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Como with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Como more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Como

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Como. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Como. The network helps show where David R. Como may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside David R. Como, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David R. Como Line = papers co-authored together David R. Como links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200433
2 200627
3 200824
4 200718
5 201817
6 200014
7 200310
8 200610
9 20129
10 19998
11 19985
12 20083
13 20211
14 20200
15 20180
16 20010

About David R. Como

David R. Como is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Classics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 179 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (9 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (139 citations), Religious studies (20 citations), Political Science and International Relations (78 citations), Classics (11 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations). David R. Como has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Lake, John Morrill, Dewey D. Wallace, Alexandra Walsham, Francis J. Bremer, David D. Hall, John Craig, Margo Todd, Paul C. H. Lim and Patrick Collinson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of British Studies, Huntington Library Quarterly, The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, Past & Present and Sixteenth Century Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact