William Lamont
Impact in
- History top 5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Scottish History and National Identity
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Political Theory and Influence
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 6
- History 4
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
- Scottish History and National Identity 2
- Co-authors
- Conal Condren (1 shared paper)Lawrence E. Klein (1 shared paper)William W. Klein (1 shared paper)Lois G. Schwoerer (1 shared paper)John Robertson (1 shared paper)J. G. A. Pocock (1 shared paper)Gordon J. Schochet (1 shared paper)Istvan Hont (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The English Historical Review (5 papers)Past & Present (4 papers)History Workshop Journal (3 papers)History (1 paper)Western Folklore (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William Lamont
10 papers receiving 68 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- History 46
- Political Science and International Relations 52
- Religious studies 9
- Classics 6
- Philosophy 17
Countries citing papers authored by William Lamont
This map shows the geographic impact of William Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Lamont more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Lamont
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Lamont. The network helps show where William Lamont may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside William Lamont, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 85 | |
| 2 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1972 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 5 | In Pursuit of Purity, Unity, and Liberty: Richard Baxter's Puritan Ecclesiology in its Seventeenth-Century Context | 2005 | 2 |
| 6 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 9 | Baxter: A holy commonwealth | 1994 | 1 |
| 10 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 13 | Last Witnesses: The Muggletonian History, 1652–1979 | 2006 | 1 |
| 14 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 0 |
About William Lamont
William Lamont is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 111 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (1 paper), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper), Irish and British Studies (1 paper) and Parental Involvement in Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (46 citations), Political Science and International Relations (52 citations), Religious studies (9 citations), Classics (6 citations) and Philosophy (17 citations). William Lamont has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Conal Condren, Lawrence E. Klein, William W. Klein, Lois G. Schwoerer, John Robertson, J. G. A. Pocock, Gordon J. Schochet, Istvan Hont, James Tully and Jonathan Scott. Their work appears in journals such as The English Historical Review, Past & Present, History Workshop Journal, History and Western Folklore.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.