Tom Webster
Impact in
- History top 2%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Scottish History and National Identity
- Historical Studies of British Isles
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
-
- Medieval Literature and History
Papers in
-
- Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction 2
- Legal case studies and regulations 1
- World Trade Organization Law 1
-
- International Arbitration and Investment Law 4
- Dispute Resolution and Class Actions 3
- Co-authors
- N. H. Keeble (1 shared paper)David R. Como (1 shared paper)Dewey D. Wallace (1 shared paper)John Coffey (1 shared paper)Alexandra Walsham (1 shared paper)Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe (1 shared paper)Patrick Collinson (1 shared paper)Francis J. Bremer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The William and Mary Quarterly (1 paper)The Historical Journal (1 paper)Rethinking History (1 paper)Arbitration International (4 papers)Cambridge University Press eBooks (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceRussia
In The Last Decade
Tom Webster
6 papers receiving 58 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- History 62
- Classics 12
- Religious studies 10
- Political Science and International Relations 33
- Museology 4
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Webster
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Webster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Webster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Webster. The network helps show where Tom Webster may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Tom Webster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 31 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 7 | 'Kiss me with the kisses of his mouth': gender inversion and Canticles in godly spirituality | 2002 | 0 |
| 8 | 1998 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 0 |
About Tom Webster
Tom Webster is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Health, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 10 papers that have together received 83 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Arbitration and Investment Law (4 papers), Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (3 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (2 papers), Legal case studies and regulations (1 paper), Irish and British Studies (1 paper), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (1 paper), World Trade Organization Law (1 paper) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (62 citations), Classics (12 citations), Religious studies (10 citations), Political Science and International Relations (33 citations) and Museology (4 citations). Tom Webster has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Russia. Frequent co-authors include N. H. Keeble, David R. Como, Dewey D. Wallace, John Coffey, Alexandra Walsham, Charles E. Hambrick-Stowe, Patrick Collinson, Francis J. Bremer, John Spurr and Margo Todd. Their work appears in journals such as The William and Mary Quarterly, The Historical Journal, Rethinking History, Arbitration International and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.