David M. Lyth

621 citations
17 papers · 419 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

David M. Lyth

17 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

David M. Lyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 186
  • Management Information Systems 132
  • Marketing 90
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 11
  • Strategy and Management 108
Replace Blair J. Berkley with:
Blair J. Berkley United States
Hsi-Tien Chen Taiwan
Julie M. Hays United States
Hsiu‐Yuan Hu Taiwan
Jari Juga Finland
K. Koelemeijer Netherlands
Tsuang Kuo Taiwan
Seyed‐Mahmoud Aghazadeh United States
Christine Pitt Sweden
Arvinder P.S. Loomba United States
David M. Lyth relative to Blair J. Berkley United States Blair J. Berkley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Blair J. Berkley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David M. Lyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Lyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Lyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Lyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Lyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Lyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Lyth. The network helps show where David M. Lyth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside David M. Lyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David M. Lyth Line = papers co-authored together David M. Lyth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1990154
2 200353
3 199752
4 200328
5 199226
6 199221
7 200817
8 201311
9 202011
10 198910
11 19959
12 19958
13 20056
14
EVALUATING A NEW KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TOOL
20084
15 20144
16 20093
17 20182

About David M. Lyth

David M. Lyth is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 17 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (5 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (4 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (3 papers), Quality and Management Systems (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers) and Product Development and Customization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (186 citations), Management Information Systems (132 citations), Marketing (90 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (11 citations) and Strategy and Management (108 citations). David M. Lyth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Linda M. Delene, Larry A. Mallak, Robert Landeros and Robert Reck. Their work appears in journals such as Engineering Management Journal, Quality Engineering, Computers & Industrial Engineering, International Journal of Service Industry Management and Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact