David Limerick

14 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

David Limerick
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 124
  • Research and Theory 5
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 41
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 12
  • Strategy and Management 74
Replace George Boak with:
George Boak United Kingdom
Bert Cunnington Australia
Lew Taylor United States
Paula S. Weber United States
Charles Margerison Australia
Lindsay Nelson Australia
Burt K. Scanlan
Dalton E. McFarland United States
John Beck Singapore
Robert F. Dennehy United States
David Limerick relative to George Boak United Kingdom George Boak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
George Boak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Limerick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Limerick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Limerick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Limerick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Limerick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Limerick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Limerick. The network helps show where David Limerick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside David Limerick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Limerick Line = papers co-authored together David Limerick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
Managing The New Organisation. A Blueprint for Networks and Strategic Alliances
1993107
2
Managing the new organisation : collaboration and sustainability in the postcorporate world
200269
3 199447
4
The relationship between andragogical and pedagogical orientation and the implications for adult learning
199437
5 199432
6 199218
7 198715
8 199111
9 198510
10 19907
11 19765
12 19873
13 19891
14 19911
15 19761

About David Limerick

David Limerick is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Applied Psychology and Accounting, having authored 15 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Learning Practices (2 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (2 papers), Management, Economics, and Public Policy (1 paper), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (1 paper) and Accounting Education and Careers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (124 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (41 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (12 citations) and Strategy and Management (74 citations). David Limerick has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and India. Frequent co-authors include Bert Cunnington, Frank Crowther, Greg Hearn, Brian L. Delahaye and Larry F. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Journal of Management Development, The Learning Organization, Policy and Society and Management Decision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact