David L. Bates

1.1k citations
19 papers · 995 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

David L. Bates

19 papers receiving 888 citations

Peers

David L. Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Biochemistry 185
  • Clinical Biochemistry 131
  • Developmental Biology 30
  • Molecular Biology 622
  • Genetics 94
Replace E. A. M. Fleer with:
E. A. M. Fleer Germany
Thomas W. O’Brien United States
Grahame Bulfield United Kingdom
Hye Won Choi South Korea
Stuart M. Heywood United States
Ariane Monneron France
Peter A. van Paridon Netherlands
K M Swiderek United States
Marcelo J. Alfonzo Venezuela
Vernon C. Bode United States
David L. Bates relative to E. A. M. Fleer Germany E. A. M. Fleer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
E. A. M. Fleer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David L. Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David L. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David L. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David L. Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David L. Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David L. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David L. Bates. The network helps show where David L. Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David L. Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David L. Bates Line = papers co-authored together David L. Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1981191
2 1977126
3 1981112
4 1986111
5 199386
6 197574
7 198473
8 197563
9 199055
10 197932
11 198730
12 198513
13 198811
14 19798
15 19873
16 19763
17
'We Didnae Do Anything Great…' Discursive Strategies for Resisting Detention and Deportation in Scotland and the North East of England
20132
18 19971
19 20001

About David L. Bates

David L. Bates is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 995 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Acid Research Studies (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (2 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (185 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (131 citations), Developmental Biology (30 citations), Molecular Biology (622 citations) and Genetics (94 citations). David L. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Jean Thomas, Richard N. Perham, Edwin C. Pearson, P.J.G. Butler, M. Brock Fenton, G Hale, John R. Coggins, Elizabeth A. Hooper, Michael J. Danson and Axel Johannsson. Their work appears in journals such as FEBS Letters, European Journal of Biochemistry, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis and Analytical Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact