David L. Bates
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 2%
- Biochemical Acid Research Studies
- Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
- Clinical Biochemistry top 5%
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 3
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 3
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 2
-
- Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research 3
- Co-authors
- Jean Thomas (3 shared papers)Richard N. Perham (4 shared papers)Edwin C. Pearson (2 shared papers)G Hale (2 shared papers)P.J.G. Butler (1 shared paper)Michael J. Danson (1 shared paper)Elizabeth A. Hooper (1 shared paper)John R. Coggins (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- FEBS Letters (2 papers)European Journal of Biochemistry (2 papers)Trends in biotechnology (1 paper)Clinical Chemistry (1 paper)Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
David L. Bates
16 papers receiving 852 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Biochemistry 181
- Clinical Biochemistry 129
- Developmental Biology 27
- Molecular Biology 595
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 63
Countries citing papers authored by David L. Bates
This map shows the geographic impact of David L. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David L. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David L. Bates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David L. Bates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David L. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David L. Bates. The network helps show where David L. Bates may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David L. Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 187 | |
| 2 | 1977 | 123 | |
| 3 | 1981 | 109 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 97 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 85 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 72 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 70 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 62 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 47 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 29 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 28 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1979 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1976 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 2 |
About David L. Bates
David L. Bates is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 943 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers), Biochemical Acid Research Studies (3 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers) and Enzyme Structure and Function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (181 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (129 citations), Developmental Biology (27 citations), Molecular Biology (595 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (63 citations). David L. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Jean Thomas, Richard N. Perham, Edwin C. Pearson, G Hale, P.J.G. Butler, Michael J. Danson, Elizabeth A. Hooper, John R. Coggins, M. Brock Fenton and Axel Johannsson. Their work appears in journals such as FEBS Letters, European Journal of Biochemistry, Trends in biotechnology, Clinical Chemistry and Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.