David Hope
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Blood transfusion and management
- Family Practice top 10%
Papers in
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 6
- Medical Education and Admissions 2
-
- Innovative Teaching Methods 2
- Co-authors
- Helen Cameron (7 shared papers)Alan Jaap (6 shared papers)Ian J. Deary (4 shared papers)Timothy C. Bates (4 shared papers)David Kluth (3 shared papers)Karen Fairhurst (1 shared paper)Colin Duncan (1 shared paper)B. M. Barraclough (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Medical Teacher (5 papers)BMC Medical Education (3 papers)Advances in Health Sciences Education (1 paper)Academic Medicine (1 paper)Economics & Human Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesHungary
In The Last Decade
David Hope
25 papers receiving 409 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Biochemistry 70
- Family Practice 16
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 25
- Health Informatics 6
- General Dentistry 5
Countries citing papers authored by David Hope
This map shows the geographic impact of David Hope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hope more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Hope
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hope. The network helps show where David Hope may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Hope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 89 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 12 | BENEFITS OF INTENSIVE MODE TEACHING TO IMPROVE STUDENT PERFORMANCE | 2013 | 12 |
| 13 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 5 |
About David Hope
David Hope is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 27 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (1 paper), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (1 paper) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (70 citations), Family Practice (16 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (25 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations) and General Dentistry (5 citations). David Hope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Helen Cameron, Alan Jaap, Ian J. Deary, Timothy C. Bates, David Kluth, Karen Fairhurst, Colin Duncan, B. M. Barraclough, Steff Lewis and John Forbes. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, BMC Medical Education, Advances in Health Sciences Education, Academic Medicine and Economics & Human Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.