Peter‐Michael Sack

1.1k citations
42 papers · 841 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter‐Michael Sack

42 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

Peter‐Michael Sack
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Clinical Psychology 325
  • Applied Psychology 41
  • Social Psychology 165
  • Pharmacology 109
  • Epidemiology 205
Replace Mindy A. Herman-Stahl with:
Mindy A. Herman-Stahl United States
Michele Morales United States
Harith S. Swadi United Kingdom
Sergio Fernández‐Artamendi Spain
Sharon M. Boles United States
Jody L. Kamon United States
Mark Beitel United States
Sylvie Ledoux France
Jessica E. Nargiso United States
E Webb United Kingdom
Peter‐Michael Sack relative to Mindy A. Herman-Stahl United States Mindy A. Herman-Stahl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Mindy A. Herman-Stahl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter‐Michael Sack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter‐Michael Sack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter‐Michael Sack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter‐Michael Sack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter‐Michael Sack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter‐Michael Sack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter‐Michael Sack. The network helps show where Peter‐Michael Sack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter‐Michael Sack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter‐Michael Sack Line = papers co-authored together Peter‐Michael Sack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009126
2 2005108
3 2016105
4 201274
5 200956
6 201638
7 200733
8 201728
9 200427
10 201422
11 201722
12 201518
13 202014
14 201414
15 202113
16 201913
17 200112
18 201011
19 201111
20 201611

About Peter‐Michael Sack

Peter‐Michael Sack is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Epidemiology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 42 papers that have together received 841 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (13 papers), Health and Medical Studies (6 papers), Youth Substance Use and School Attendance (5 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (325 citations), Applied Psychology (41 citations), Social Psychology (165 citations), Pharmacology (109 citations) and Epidemiology (205 citations). Peter‐Michael Sack has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rainer Thomasius, Martin Stolle, Andreas Schindler, Sonja Bröning, Nicolas Arnaud, Florian Ganzer, Stefanie Kraft, Kay Uwe Petersen, Jochen Eckert and Lutz Wartberg. Their work appears in journals such as Attachment & Human Development, Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy, Academic Emergency Medicine, European Journal of Public Health and BMC Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact