David Glasspool

32 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers

David Glasspool
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Health Information Management 101
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 132
  • Management Information Systems 69
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 146
Replace Andrew McMurry with:
Andrew McMurry United States
Eugenio Alberdi United Kingdom
Eugene Tseytlin United States
Vimla L. Patel United States
Cord Spreckelsen Germany
Oliver J. Bott Germany
Christopher Parisien Canada
Stephan Kiefer Germany
Michael Lincoln United States
Rebecca Nugent United States
David Glasspool relative to Andrew McMurry United States Andrew McMurry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.8×
Andrew McMurry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Glasspool

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Glasspool's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Glasspool with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Glasspool more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Glasspool

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Glasspool. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Glasspool. The network helps show where David Glasspool may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Glasspool, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Glasspool Line = papers co-authored together David Glasspool links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200084
2 201165
3 199960
4 200753
5 200551
6 199537
7
Understanding intelligent agents: analysis and synthesis
200336
8 200931
9 200131
10 200530
11 200430
12 201325
13 201119
14 201313
15 200712
16 201312
17 201111
18 200611
19
Argumentation in Decision Support for Medical Care Planning for Patients and Clinicians.
20069
20 20128

About David Glasspool

David Glasspool is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Health Information Management, having authored 33 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (9 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (6 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (6 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (6 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (6 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (101 citations), Health Informatics (18 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (132 citations), Management Information Systems (69 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (146 citations). David Glasspool has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include George Houghton, Julie Fox, Tim Shallice, John Fox, Marc Cuggia, Adela Grando, Paolo Besana, Jon Emery, Mor Peleg and Anne H. Coulson. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Methods of Information in Medicine, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Journal of Biomedical Informatics and Neurocase.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact