David Gee

85 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

David Gee
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 174
  • Chemical Health and Safety 10
  • Biotechnology 117
  • Environmental Chemistry 130
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 158
Replace Donald E. Johnson with:
Donald E. Johnson United States
Yue Su China
Ross Sadler Australia
Stephen L. Young United States
Daniel Kramer United States
Robert Young United States
Shuang Chen China
Robert Park Australia
Yu Cao China
Douglas Warner United Kingdom
David Gee relative to Donald E. Johnson United States Donald E. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Donald E. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Gee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Gee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gee. The network helps show where David Gee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Gee Line = papers co-authored together David Gee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000442
2 2001168
3 1987126
4 200160
5 201353
6 200549
7 198648
8 198441
9 198939
10 199937
11 200431
12 198026
13 198825
14 200824
15 200924
16
Conclusions [to Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000]
200222
17 198421
18 201820
19 198920
20 202318

About David Gee

David Gee is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science and Emergency Medicine, having authored 100 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (9 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (7 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (6 papers), Risk Perception and Management (6 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence Applications (5 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (5 papers) and Restraint-Related Deaths (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (174 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (10 citations), Biotechnology (117 citations), Environmental Chemistry (130 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (158 citations). David Gee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include James Morison, Matthew Rayment, Jules Pretty, Rachel Hine, Gareth Griffiths, Hugh Raven, Charles F. Mason, Chris Mason, Craig Brett and Thomas L. Dobbs. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine Science and the Law, International Journal of Impact Engineering, Forensic Science International, Journal of Clinical Pathology and The Journal of Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact