David Gee
Impact in
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Chemical Health and Safety top 10%
Papers in
-
- Artificial Intelligence in Law 6
- Co-authors
- Rachel Hine (2 shared papers)James Morison (2 shared papers)Jules Pretty (2 shared papers)Matthew Rayment (2 shared papers)Gareth Griffiths (4 shared papers)Hugh Raven (1 shared paper)Charles F. Mason (1 shared paper)Thomas L. Dobbs (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Medicine Science and the Law (9 papers)Forensic Science International (3 papers)International Journal of Impact Engineering (3 papers)The Journal of Pathology (2 papers)Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
David Gee
79 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 162
- Chemical Health and Safety 9
- Biotechnology 115
- Environmental Chemistry 119
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 139
Countries citing papers authored by David Gee
This map shows the geographic impact of David Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Gee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gee. The network helps show where David Gee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 400 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 161 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 116 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 51 | |
| 5 | 1986 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 40 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 36 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 34 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 24 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 20 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 17 |
About David Gee
David Gee is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science and Immunology, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (8 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (6 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (6 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (5 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (5 papers), Risk Perception and Management (5 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (5 papers) and Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (162 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (9 citations), Biotechnology (115 citations), Environmental Chemistry (119 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (139 citations). David Gee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Hine, James Morison, Jules Pretty, Matthew Rayment, Gareth Griffiths, Hugh Raven, Charles F. Mason, Thomas L. Dobbs, Craig Brett and Chris Mason. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine Science and the Law, Forensic Science International, International Journal of Impact Engineering, The Journal of Pathology and Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.