David Fancy
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 10%
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Biotin and Related Studies
Papers in
-
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 2
-
- Theatre and Performance Studies 6
- Artistic and Creative Research 2
- Co-authors
- Thomas Kodadek (7 shared papers)Kyonghee Kim (2 shared papers)Carilee Denison (2 shared papers)Yueqing Xie (2 shared papers)Stephen R. Sprang (2 shared papers)Andreas Gille (1 shared paper)Tung‐Chung Mou (1 shared paper)Roland Seifert (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (2 papers)Performance Research (2 papers)Contemporary Theatre Review (2 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (2 papers)Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaRussia
In The Last Decade
David Fancy
20 papers receiving 935 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Biomaterials 147
- Cell Biology 154
- Organic Chemistry 225
- Molecular Biology 522
- Molecular Medicine 37
Countries citing papers authored by David Fancy
This map shows the geographic impact of David Fancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Fancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Fancy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Fancy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Fancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Fancy. The network helps show where David Fancy may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Fancy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 499 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 110 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 52 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 1 |
About David Fancy
David Fancy is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cell Biology, Materials Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 29 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (6 papers), Biotin and Related Studies (4 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (2 papers) and Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (147 citations), Cell Biology (154 citations), Organic Chemistry (225 citations), Molecular Biology (522 citations) and Molecular Medicine (37 citations). David Fancy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Kodadek, Kyonghee Kim, Carilee Denison, Yueqing Xie, Stephen R. Sprang, Andreas Gille, Tung‐Chung Mou, Roland Seifert, Stephen Albert Johnston and Karsten Melcher. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Performance Research, Contemporary Theatre Review, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.