David Fancy
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 10%
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Biotin and Related Studies
Papers in
-
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 2
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 2
-
- Biotin and Related Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Thomas Kodadek (7 shared papers)Kyonghee Kim (2 shared papers)Yueqing Xie (2 shared papers)Carilee Denison (2 shared papers)Stephen R. Sprang (2 shared papers)Tung‐Chung Mou (1 shared paper)Roland Seifert (1 shared paper)Andreas Gille (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Contemporary Theatre Review (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Performance Research (2 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (2 papers)Current Opinion in Chemical Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaCanada
In The Last Decade
David Fancy
18 papers receiving 907 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Biomaterials 143
- Cell Biology 155
- Organic Chemistry 224
- Molecular Biology 529
- Molecular Medicine 37
Countries citing papers authored by David Fancy
This map shows the geographic impact of David Fancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Fancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Fancy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Fancy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Fancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Fancy. The network helps show where David Fancy may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Fancy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 481 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 52 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 16 | Affirmative Freakery, Freaky Methodologies: Circus and Its Bodies without Organs in Disability Circus | 2018 | 1 |
| 17 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 0 |
About David Fancy
David Fancy is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Organic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 925 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (5 papers), Biotin and Related Studies (5 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (4 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Artistic and Creative Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (143 citations), Cell Biology (155 citations), Organic Chemistry (224 citations), Molecular Biology (529 citations) and Molecular Medicine (37 citations). David Fancy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Kodadek, Kyonghee Kim, Yueqing Xie, Carilee Denison, Stephen R. Sprang, Tung‐Chung Mou, Roland Seifert, Andreas Gille, Karsten Melcher and Stephen Albert Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Theatre Review, PLoS ONE, Performance Research, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Current Opinion in Chemical Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.