Contemporary Theatre Review

652 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 652 papers published in Contemporary Theatre Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Theatre Review usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (313 papers), Sociology and Political Science (131 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (78 papers) specifically the topics of Theatre and Performance Studies (299 papers), Diversity and Impact of Dance (53 papers) and Irish and British Studies (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Theatre Review are Jennifer Parker-Starbuck, Jen Harvie, Philip Auslander, Deirdre Heddon, Joe Kelleher, Petra Küppers, Josephine Machon, Kirsty Sedgman, Peter M. Boenisch and David Barnett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Theatre Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Theatre Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Theatre Review.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Theatre Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Theatre Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Theatre Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Theatre Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025