Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

223.2k citations
2.9k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
    • Click Chemistry and Applications

Papers in

    • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 338
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 266
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 202
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 196
    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 189
    • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 163

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

2.8k papers receiving 212.5k citations

Peers

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Molecular Biology 134.1k
  • Organic Chemistry 40.0k
  • Spectroscopy 19.0k
  • Biotechnology 8.9k
  • Biophysics 5.7k
Replace Nature Chemical Biology with:
Nature Chemical Biology United States
Structure United States
Drug Discovery Today United States
Current Opinion in Structural Biology United States
ACS Chemical Biology United States
Nature Protocols United States
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery United States
Trends in Biochemical Sciences United States
Current Opinion in Biotechnology United States
Trends in biotechnology United States
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology relative to Nature Chemical Biology United States Nature Chemical Biology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nature Chemical Biology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Chemical Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Chemical Biology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Chemical Biology.

About Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

The 2.9k papers published in Current Opinion in Chemical Biology in the last decades have received a total of 223.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Opinion in Chemical Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (2.1k papers), Biophysics (117 papers), Organic Chemistry (503 papers), Spectroscopy (291 papers) and Structural Biology (19 papers) specifically the topics of Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (338 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (266 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (241 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (202 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (196 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (192 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (189 papers) and Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (163 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Chemical Biology are John V. Frangioni, Ashley Ian Bush, Paul S. Cremer, Peter John Sadler, Alexander S. S. Dömling, Arasu Ganesan, Stephen J. Lippard, Pieter C. A. Bruijnincx, Donald F. Steiner and Frances H. Arnold.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact