Countries where authors publish in The Art Bulletin
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Art Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Art Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Art Bulletin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Art Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Art Bulletin.
About The Art Bulletin
The 4.1k papers published in The Art Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 24.0k indexed citations . Papers published in The Art Bulletin usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (1.0k papers), Classics (600 papers), History (1.4k papers), Museology (397 papers) and Conservation (312 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (681 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (553 papers), Architecture and Art History Studies (527 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (311 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (291 papers), Historical Art and Architecture Studies (275 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (249 papers) and Art History and Market Analysis (206 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Art Bulletin are E. H. Gombrich, Erwin Panofsky, James Elkins, Jamés S. Ackerman, John Martin, Wolfgang M. Zucker, Nelson Goodman, Finbarr Barry Flood, Norman Bryson and Svetlana Alpers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.