David DeNofrio

2.1k citations
49 papers · 1.7k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

David DeNofrio

48 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

David DeNofrio
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Transplantation 524
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 509
  • Physiology 52
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 156
  • Surgery 420
Replace Frederick Jay Fricker with:
Frederick Jay Fricker United States
John M. Armitage United States
RONALD E. DRUSIN United States
M. Carrier Canada
Raemma Paredes Luck United States
José María Arizón Spain
James D. Bergin United States
Stinson Eb United States
Abdallah Kfoury United States
C.N. Barnard South Africa
David DeNofrio relative to Frederick Jay Fricker United States Frederick Jay Fricker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Frederick Jay Fricker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David DeNofrio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David DeNofrio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David DeNofrio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David DeNofrio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David DeNofrio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David DeNofrio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David DeNofrio. The network helps show where David DeNofrio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David DeNofrio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David DeNofrio Line = papers co-authored together David DeNofrio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006293
2 2000140
3 1999114
4 2000113
5 1999109
6 2001104
7 2000103
8 200986
9 199972
10 201154
11 201150
12 200540
13 199935
14 200333
15 201432
16 199831
17 200031
18 200030
19 200823
20 200323

About David DeNofrio

David DeNofrio is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Transplantation, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (12 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (6 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (5 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (4 papers), Neurological Complications and Syndromes (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (524 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (509 citations), Physiology (52 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (156 citations) and Surgery (420 citations). David DeNofrio has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Evan Loh, Leslie M. Shaw, Kenneth L. Brayman, Magdalena Korecka, Bruce E. Kaplan, Paul D. Mahoney, Eric J. Stanek, William F. McGhan, Yann Le Meur and Teun van Gelder. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, The American Journal of Cardiology, American Heart Journal, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Journal of Cardiac Failure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact