James O. Mudd

5.6k citations
74 papers · 3.9k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

James O. Mudd

72 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

James O. Mudd
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.9k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 221
  • Emergency Medicine 281
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 627
  • Surgery 731
Replace Eric Novak with:
Eric Novak United States
Amrut V. Ambardekar United States
Maya Guglin United States
Cécile Laroche France
Micha T. Maeder Switzerland
Jin‐Oh Choi South Korea
David Prior Australia
Rajkumar Doshi United States
Atsushi Hirayama Japan
Michael A. Mathier United States
James O. Mudd relative to Eric Novak United States Eric Novak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Eric Novak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James O. Mudd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James O. Mudd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James O. Mudd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James O. Mudd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James O. Mudd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James O. Mudd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James O. Mudd. The network helps show where James O. Mudd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James O. Mudd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James O. Mudd Line = papers co-authored together James O. Mudd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009330
2 2011317
3 2008306
4 2017295
5 2012236
6 2013191
7 2000183
8 2011151
9 2008144
10 2013102
11 200796
12 200190
13 201188
14 201184
15 201375
16 200768
17 201464
18 201264
19 201359
20 201654

About James O. Mudd

James O. Mudd is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (24 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (21 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (8 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (5 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (5 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.9k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (221 citations), Emergency Medicine (281 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (627 citations) and Surgery (731 citations). James O. Mudd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David A. Kass, Jill M. Gelow, Christopher S. Lee, Shirin O. Hiatt, Quin E. Denfeld, Navin K. Kapur, Christopher Chien, Stuart D. Russell, Kerri M. Winters‐Stone and Ilan S. Wittstein. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Heart & Lung, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation and Journal of Cardiac Failure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact