David C. Thomas

55 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

David C. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 46
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 277
  • Family Practice 27
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 50
  • General Health Professions 323
Replace Lynn Martin with:
Lynn Martin Canada
Victoria Senior United Kingdom
Hiroshi Hirai Japan
Isaac Sasson United States
Harvey Schipper Canada
Maria Hewitt United States
Zheng Ren China
Karen Gold United States
Anne Lanceley United Kingdom
José Ramón Martínez Riera Spain
David C. Thomas relative to Lynn Martin Canada Lynn Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Lynn Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Thomas. The network helps show where David C. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David C. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David C. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together David C. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996482
2 2009131
3 1991107
4 201288
5 199670
6 200967
7 201163
8 200656
9 200348
10 201344
11 200643
12 196332
13 201625
14 200325
15 200423
16 200318
17 201316
18 201315
19 198915
20 201614

About David C. Thomas

David C. Thomas is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Molecular Biology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (12 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (46 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (277 citations), Family Practice (27 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (50 citations) and General Health Professions (323 citations). David C. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Yasmin Meah, Thomas A. Kunkel, Allan Clark, Jeffrey A. Simon, Andrew B. Buermeyer, R. Michael Liskay, Asad Umar, Eric L. Smith, Kira L. Ryskina and Gail M. Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, The Medical Journal of Australia, BMC Medical Education and Academic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact