Danielle Pollock
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Papers in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 45
-
- Global Maternal and Child Health 10
- Co-authors
- Andrea C. Tricco (27 shared papers)Zachary Munn (39 shared papers)Hanan Khalil (20 shared papers)Christina M. Godfrey (21 shared papers)Micah D.J. Peters (13 shared papers)Patricia A. McInerney (12 shared papers)Lyndsay Alexander (12 shared papers)Casey Marnie (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- JBI Evidence Synthesis (26 papers)Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (16 papers)Women and Birth (8 papers)BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine (4 papers)Research Synthesis Methods (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Danielle Pollock
79 papers receiving 9.6k citations
Danielle Pollock's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
- Health Informatics 183
- General Health Professions 1.6k
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 538
- Research and Theory 177
- Leadership and Management 69
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Pollock
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Pollock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Pollock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Pollock. The network helps show where Danielle Pollock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 4421 |
| 2 | Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 1107 |
| 3 | Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 962 |
| 4 | Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 780 |
| 5 | Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 508 |
| 6 | What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 410 |
| 7 | 2020 | 217 | |
| 8 | Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 194 |
| 9 | Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 126 |
| 10 | Reporting and conducting patient journey mapping research in healthcare: A scoping review Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 94 |
| 11 | 2021 | 92 | |
| 12 | An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses Evaluating Associations between Human Health and Exposure to Major Classes of Plastic-Associated Chemicals Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 74 |
| 13 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 51 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 45 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 39 | |
| 17 | Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol Hit paper breakdown → | 2025 | 37 |
| 18 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 31 |
About Danielle Pollock
Danielle Pollock is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 9.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (45 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (10 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (9 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (5 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (4 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (183 citations), General Health Professions (1.6k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (538 citations), Research and Theory (177 citations) and Leadership and Management (69 citations). Danielle Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrea C. Tricco, Zachary Munn, Hanan Khalil, Christina M. Godfrey, Micah D.J. Peters, Patricia A. McInerney, Lyndsay Alexander, Casey Marnie, Ashrita Saran and Cindy Stern. Their work appears in journals such as JBI Evidence Synthesis, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Women and Birth, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine and Research Synthesis Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.