Andrea C. Tricco
Impact in
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 0.05%
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Informatics top 0.5%
Papers in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 66
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 18
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 7
- Co-authors
- Sharon E. Straus (144 shared papers)David Moher (59 shared papers)Hanan Khalil (18 shared papers)Micah D.J. Peters (13 shared papers)Danielle Pollock (23 shared papers)Zachary Munn (17 shared papers)Christina Godfrey (21 shared papers)Patricia McInerney (11 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (59 papers)Systematic Reviews (45 papers)BMJ Open (35 papers)BMC Medicine (13 papers)PLoS ONE (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Andrea C. Tricco
334 papers receiving 26.8k citations
Andrea C. Tricco's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 219
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 2.0k
- Health Informatics 218
- General Health Professions 3.5k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 372
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 483
Countries citing papers authored by Andrea C. Tricco
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrea C. Tricco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrea C. Tricco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrea C. Tricco more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrea C. Tricco
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrea C. Tricco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrea C. Tricco. The network helps show where Andrea C. Tricco may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrea C. Tricco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 346 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 3795 |
| 2 | Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 2092 |
| 3 | A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 1505 |
| 4 | Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 907 |
| 5 | Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 873 |
| 6 | A scoping review of rapid review methods Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 795 |
| 7 | Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 663 |
| 8 | Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 624 |
| 9 | Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 486 |
| 10 | Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 485 |
| 11 | Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 479 |
| 12 | Harassment and Discrimination in Medical Training Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 467 |
| 13 | Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 464 |
| 14 | Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 447 |
| 15 | Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 444 |
| 16 | Comparisons of Interventions for Preventing Falls in Older Adults Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 405 |
| 17 | 2008 | 338 | |
| 18 | Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 332 |
| 19 | 2013 | 312 | |
| 20 | Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 303 |
About Andrea C. Tricco
Andrea C. Tricco is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics and Pharmacology, having authored 346 papers that have together received 27.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (66 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (18 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (17 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (11 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (8 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers) and Influenza Virus Research Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (2.0k citations), Health Informatics (218 citations), General Health Professions (3.5k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (372 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (483 citations). Andrea C. Tricco has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sharon E. Straus, David Moher, Hanan Khalil, Micah D.J. Peters, Danielle Pollock, Zachary Munn, Christina Godfrey, Patricia McInerney, Lyndsay Alexander and Casey Marnie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Systematic Reviews, BMJ Open, BMC Medicine and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.