Joanne E. McKenzie
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 0.1%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.2%
Papers in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 80
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 9
- Co-authors
- Matthew James Page (47 shared papers)Sue Brennan (28 shared papers)David Moher (15 shared papers)Vivian Andrea Welch (8 shared papers)James Andrew Thomas (7 shared papers)Larissa Shamseer (4 shared papers)Isabelle Boutron (4 shared papers)Hilary Thomson (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (34 papers)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (14 papers)Systematic Reviews (13 papers)F1000Research (11 papers)BMJ (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Joanne E. McKenzie
208 papers receiving 118.5k citations
Joanne E. McKenzie's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
- Health Informatics 818
- Psychiatry and Mental health 4.6k
- Clinical Psychology 6.2k
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 2.2k
- Applied Psychology 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Joanne E. McKenzie
This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne E. McKenzie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne E. McKenzie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne E. McKenzie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne E. McKenzie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne E. McKenzie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne E. McKenzie. The network helps show where Joanne E. McKenzie may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joanne E. McKenzie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 213 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 67710 |
| 2 | The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 10995 |
| 3 | The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 9320 |
| 4 | PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 8068 |
| 5 | The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 3880 |
| 6 | The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 3307 |
| 7 | Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 2749 |
| 8 | Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 2110 |
| 9 | Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 1400 |
| 10 | Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 1033 |
| 11 | Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 818 |
| 12 | Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 513 |
| 13 | Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 477 |
| 14 | Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 394 |
| 15 | Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 326 |
| 16 | Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2nd edition Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 311 |
| 17 | 2017 | 269 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 227 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 224 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 214 |
About Joanne E. McKenzie
Joanne E. McKenzie is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 213 papers that have together received 120.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (80 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (24 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (10 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Trace Elements in Health (5 papers) and Iron Metabolism and Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (818 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4.6k citations), Clinical Psychology (6.2k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (2.2k citations) and Applied Psychology (1.3k citations). Joanne E. McKenzie has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matthew James Page, Sue Brennan, David Moher, Vivian Andrea Welch, James Andrew Thomas, Larissa Shamseer, Isabelle Boutron, Hilary Thomson, Tammy Hoffmann and Cynthia D. Mulrow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Systematic Reviews, F1000Research and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.