Danielle Ferriday

1.8k citations
53 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Ferriday

47 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Danielle Ferriday
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Sensory Systems 164
  • Reproductive Medicine 268
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 152
  • Clinical Psychology 403
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 271
Replace Lone Brinkmann Sørensen with:
Lone Brinkmann Sørensen Denmark
Petra Platte Germany
Sofie G.T. Lemmens Netherlands
Paula J. Geiselman United States
Joël A. Grinker United States
Jenneke van Ditzhuijzen Netherlands
D.D. Krahn United States
Heather J. Leidy United States
Reinhard J. Tuschl Germany
E. A. Rowe United Kingdom
Danielle Ferriday relative to Lone Brinkmann Sørensen Denmark Lone Brinkmann Sørensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Lone Brinkmann Sørensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Ferriday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Ferriday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Ferriday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Ferriday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Ferriday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Ferriday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Ferriday. The network helps show where Danielle Ferriday may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Ferriday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Ferriday Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Ferriday links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007300
2 2010153
3 2008108
4 2011103
5 2019100
6 201299
7 201672
8 202259
9 201357
10 201836
11 200736
12 201036
13 201532
14 201528
15 201527
16 201619
17 201718
18 202018
19 201311
20 201610

About Danielle Ferriday

Danielle Ferriday is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (29 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (15 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (11 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (10 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (6 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (6 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (164 citations), Reproductive Medicine (268 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (152 citations), Clinical Psychology (403 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (271 citations). Danielle Ferriday has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M. Brunstrom, Peter J. Rogers, Louise Dye, A. H. Balen, Bernhard Strauß, Louise Barnard, Elanor C. Hinton, Stephanie H. Fay, Laura L. Wilkinson and Hendrik J. Smit. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Nutrients, PLoS ONE, Physiology & Behavior and Nutrition Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact