Daniela Gutiérrez

22 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Daniela Gutiérrez
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Endocrinology 54
  • Sensory Systems 43
  • Speech and Hearing 43
  • Molecular Medicine 16
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 47
Replace Stefan Duscha with:
Stefan Duscha Switzerland
Yonggang Zhao China
Evelyne Paly France
S. Ernstson Sweden
Guimei Li China
Inês Mahú Portugal
Gaurav Manohar Rajani United States
Eugene V. Gasanov Russia
Bill Chan Hong Kong
Daniela Gutiérrez relative to Stefan Duscha Switzerland Stefan Duscha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.8×
Stefan Duscha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Gutiérrez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Gutiérrez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Gutiérrez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Gutiérrez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Gutiérrez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Gutiérrez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Gutiérrez. The network helps show where Daniela Gutiérrez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Gutiérrez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Gutiérrez Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Gutiérrez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201251
2 201230
3 201930
4 201430
5 200717
6 201715
7 202015
8 202015
9 201914
10 201513
11 201611
12 201111
13 202310
14 20219
15 20238
16 20158
17 20247
18 20184
19 20224
20 20133

About Daniela Gutiérrez

Daniela Gutiérrez is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Endocrinology and Pharmacology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (6 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (4 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (3 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (1 paper) and Bartonella species infections research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (54 citations), Sensory Systems (43 citations), Speech and Hearing (43 citations), Molecular Medicine (16 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (47 citations). Daniela Gutiérrez has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jorge Caro, Alejandra Álvarez, Roberto Vidal, Felipe Del Canto, Ángel Oñate, A Zepeda, David A. Montero, Francisco J. Muñoz, Pol Picón-Pagès and Daniela Araya. Their work appears in journals such as Infection and Immunity, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Frontiers in Microbiology, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience and Progress in Neurobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact