Daniela E. Igartúa

27 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Daniela E. Igartúa
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Pharmaceutical Science 64
  • Food Science 107
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Biomaterials 68
  • Polymers and Plastics 72
Replace Nadia S. Chiaramoni with:
Nadia S. Chiaramoni Argentina
María Jimena Prieto Argentina
María Natalia Calienni Argentina
Jin Sil Lee South Korea
Chu‐Hua Li China
Masoumeh Eslamifar Iran
Lu Wen China
Agustina Alaimo Argentina
Sabina Marciano Italy
Ming Ming Wen Egypt
Daniela E. Igartúa relative to Nadia S. Chiaramoni Argentina Nadia S. Chiaramoni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Nadia S. Chiaramoni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela E. Igartúa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela E. Igartúa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela E. Igartúa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela E. Igartúa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela E. Igartúa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela E. Igartúa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela E. Igartúa. The network helps show where Daniela E. Igartúa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daniela E. Igartúa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela E. Igartúa Line = papers co-authored together Daniela E. Igartúa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201881
2 202056
3 202343
4 201836
5 201927
6 201727
7 202224
8 201523
9 201723
10 201820
11 201720
12 202418
13 202218
14 202012
15 201811
16 20139
17 20238
18 20247
19 20177
20 20207

About Daniela E. Igartúa

Daniela E. Igartúa is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Polymers and Plastics, Food Science, Materials Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 501 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers (9 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (6 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (5 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (4 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (4 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (3 papers) and Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (64 citations), Food Science (107 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation), Biomaterials (68 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (72 citations). Daniela E. Igartúa has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, Brazil and Peru. Frequent co-authors include S. Alonso, María Jimena Prieto, Carolina Martínez, Darío M. Cabezas, Gonzalo G. Palazolo, Nadia S. Chiaramoni, María Natalia Calienni, Verónica Lassalle, Marina Pífano and Simone R. Castro. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Food Research International and Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact