Daniel Zimprich

85 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Daniel Zimprich
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 339
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 692
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 438
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 319
  • Clinical Psychology 494
Replace Phoebe E. Bailey with:
Phoebe E. Bailey Australia
Cameron J. Camp United States
Daniel Grühn United States
José Miguel Latorre Spain
Jeanine M. Parisi United States
Simon Forstmeier Germany
Jason C. Allaire United States
Andrea M. Piccinin Canada
Robin L. West United States
Christina Röcke Switzerland
Daniel Zimprich relative to Phoebe E. Bailey Australia Phoebe E. Bailey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Phoebe E. Bailey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Zimprich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Zimprich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Zimprich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Zimprich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Zimprich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Zimprich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Zimprich. The network helps show where Daniel Zimprich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Zimprich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Zimprich Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Zimprich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007180
2 2011112
3 2008109
4 2008105
5 2002100
6 200781
7 200380
8 200674
9 199972
10 200871
11 200570
12 200661
13 200559
14 200455
15 200351
16 200546
17 200541
18 200937
19 200636
20 201134

About Daniel Zimprich

Daniel Zimprich is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (34 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (25 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (19 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (17 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (9 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (339 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (692 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (438 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (319 citations) and Clinical Psychology (494 citations). Daniel Zimprich has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mathias Allemand, Mike Martin, Matthias Kliegel, Philippe Rast, Christopher Hertzog, Anna Mascherek, Margie E. Lachman, A.A. Jolijn Hendriks, Marja Aartsen and Martin P.J. van Boxtel. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Aging, Memory, European Journal of Ageing, Experimental Aging Research and Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact